WhaleTimes believes repugnant and slightly revolting animals like hagfish make great role models for highlighting conservation concerns for all marine animals. “Sometimes it seems as if ecological causes are popularity contests that exclude the less attractive and less well-known, though equally vulnerable, creatures,†said WhaleTimes Director Ruth Musgrave. “There are species in peril that kids never hear about.†Last year, Hagfish Day introduced many to the vaquita, a critically endangered whale few people even know exists.
Personally, I am all about saving the cute animals. The hagfish is ugly for a reason. It is dangerous:
Gone unchecked, hagfish could make the oceans of the world do the slime-equivalent of Ice-Nine.
Do not confuse the hagfish with The Hagfish!
I endorse this wager:
ahem
Drat. I heard Goodman on KFOG on Monday and he said The Bastard Machine is his and will continue.
Bummer/happy. Good move for Tim. Especially since he doesn’t have to relo.
Glancing around SFGate today I’m not seeing any of those “This article is limited to the print edition and paid access until XXX” notices. Did they finally figure out that policy was causing their columnists to flee, and was generally a stupid business plan?
I hope Curbed can offer John King a decent salary.
Cliff Lee just got $20M richer
Alderson -> Mets
Hey, Perata — Where’d you get the $25,000?
Christie, what a pass hole
“Climate hawks” — I like it. (All the other ideas are awful.)
How to avoid Buck and McCarver
Happy HELLAween
Reading comment threads like that makes me think that in a million years, the raging debate among Earth-stationed Xywcomexian archeologists will be how humans managed to survive as long as we did.
Beane: no announcements on Ellis/Crisp/Chavez until after WS
Always true.
Yep, but they always don’t actually care in ways that seem like they do care.
Very Important Baseball Matters.
Lawyers – will the continuation be grandted?
Yes
Old-but-interesting survey of world values.
It would be interesting to see how things have changed in the last seven years.
Thanks for that.
That’s an awesome chart, Sal!
Good for Krugman:
Bad for McConnell:
Krug’s not thinking strategically enough: they don’t want to just destroy Obama — I might argue that that’s actually a smokescreen [awful pun sort of intended] for the larger/second goal — they want to destroy the economy and shred as much as they can of the safety net in order to improve their chances of retaking the WH in ’12. It’s the economy, stupid — yes, discrediting/destroying Obama is important, but smart politickers (and Boehner is one) know that for POTUS elections, it’s less about the person/ality than it is about the underlying economic conditions.