- “JP is great”? Yeesh — if this snippet is legit, I cxan see why they put it in turnaround. More legit-news-source detail.
- I agree: JP is great!
- I have no basis on which to asses this
- Not that that’s ever stopped me before:
This is a trend, people. When the [particular MLB team med/training staff] downplay the extent of an injury, then give the player a few days off before sticking him back out there, and only later realize the injury was worse than expected THREE TIMES in the span of less than three months, this is not bad luck. This is incompetence, plain and simple.
- Xbx, here’s a radical-centrist link to draw you out
- And to balance that out in my ledger
- Do they really need to know, like you said, the date and time that we leave mental stability?
JP is great: DLD 062609 37
37 thoughts on “JP is great: DLD 062609”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Obscured by that other thing
He has your hair.
Quite literally
Say, you know — somebody really oughtta write a book about fatherhood. Not your father’s fatherhood, either, or his father’s, back to the beginning of human consciousness, but a hip, “with it” sort of modern, urbane look at fatherhood, full of fresh insights born of your own unique stature as a precious snowflake. The world needs a book like that!
fer instance, didja score any ring-dings from the vending machine during labor, thereby rendering your wife the loneliest mom?
Scouts: still dumb
reztips?
Awesome! Now I know the Latin term for “supercilious, clueless douchenozzle”: vox clamans in terris
That’s a great article. And the letter from Reagan in the link at the end…
“Wait a minute, this sounds like rock and/or roll.”
Uh … wow
Um…
Nigaz got oil
Once again, the ghost of Ken Saro-Wiwa wanders the delta, shaking his head in dismay…
more:
Interesting take on the Froomkinfuffle. There’s many a good and previously unreported/unremarked-upon detail in there, but the overall case/conclusion is way overstated.
I have to admit I’m not particularly interested (but then I never read the column). Newspapers are firing writers. Froomkin is a writer. He got fired.
Agreed.
The blogospheric hand-wringing (“Fred Hiatt Crushes Brave Progressive Voice”, etc.) struck me as overwrought in the extreme. But then, like you, I rarely read Froomkin, so I suppose my indifference is unsurprising.
The only Washington Post opinion pieces I ever read are Krauthammer’s, because I like to keep tabs on what the crazy people are thinking.
“He got
fired.the opportunity to find out what his words are really worth in the great, undisciplined, unregulated blogospace of ideas.”Does the SBN Nats site
needhave any front-page talent?fixed.
I’m guessing this photo is getting a Lot more googly exposure than “Mistress Tootie Belle” ever anticipated.
central planning’s record in pop music is extremely poor, though they did okay in film
And when Yglesias is on a roll, he’s good:
Yglesias and mikeA are very similar in tone, diction, and approach to organizing/presenting arguments. If in the course of some future DLD mikeA ripped off his mask, Mission Impossible-style, to reveal Matt Yglesias’ face, I would register only mild surprise.
Would Yglesias start writing a snarky comment about your misuse of the word “diction” and then before posting look it up and realize it wasn’t misused at all?
No, he’d post the snark, with like four misspellings.
Actually, the fact that your posts aren’t riddled with typos does kind of throw a wrench into my doppelganger theory.
I think if you go back and read anything I’ve written longer than a paragraph you’ll find a trove of typos.
Yeah, but you make typos — Yglesias (and Ezra, as well) makes homonym-os.
Ripping off masks Mission Impossible style requires that there be more than one mask to rip off.
Now I get your love for “The King of Pop”
1. In other news, apparently hand-eye coordination is a key skill shared by successful major league baseball players:
2. I don’t understand this notion that you can make up for a lack of range by having a good arm (via Korach, Gallego said that about Tulowitzki). I mean, if you don’t get to the ball, you don’t get to the ball, and wtf does your arm matter at that point? It’s like saying you can make up for terrible BO by belching the alphabet with extra gusto or successfully using “concatenate” in a sentence. The BO doesn’t go away. It’s still there. You still smell bad.
3. Vince is upset that Cust is sriking out more recently. I’m like two stupid remarks away from trying to raise Bill King from the dead by cutting off one of my toes and/or sacrificing a chicken while chanting some kind of Oprah-approved “will to success” mantra. (maybe I need a better plan, but you get the point)
1. Does anyone think it’s strange that this study came out when MJ was in the news? I’m a little creeped out.
2. It’s not quite that silly. If you use all of your range to get to a ball, you need a strong arm to make the throw. Someone else with more range could get to the ball and position themselves for an easier throw. That said, your point is right. I think the solution is to have good range and a good arm.
3. :-)
Plan sounds totally sound to me.
Oh, except for the chicken part. I don’t think the chicken should have to pay for Vince’s sins.
Re: “When Brad Pitt says he’ll do your movie, 20 million dollars or not, he’s doing *you* a favor.”
Is there actually a solid correlation between revenue generation/profit and the presence of a “star”? I vaguely remember a Gladwell anecdote about how star-driven movies aren’t nearly the guarantors of success they are commonly thought to be. And if Gladwell said it, you know it’s true (and clever! and counterintuitive!).
I was or am some combination of annoyed and appalled by the “Moneyball” movie, regardless of who writes or directs it. But I’d see it anyway if it had Brad Pitt in it, because I’m not appalled enough to stay away entirely if I have one good enough reason to attend. And I’m sure I’m not alone. The real question is whether Brad Pitt’s presence would attract enough “Moneyball”-the-movie haters (like me) to offset the number of people who wouldn’t see the movie precisely because it had Brad Pitt in it. It’s a weak and untimely movie idea, so I think it would be pretty close.
You’ve been hit by a smooth criminal.