- Human beat writers will go extinct before human umpires do
- GET MOTIVATED!
- Hawt:
At one point, the former first lady produced a bobblehead figure of herself and mounted it on the lectern
- The Force is strong with this one: “This is not the contract extension you’re looking for.”
- Byg Twyt on duke
Are you surrounding yourself with success? DLD 102109 25
25 thoughts on “Are you surrounding yourself with success? DLD 102109”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Martin Eisenstadt update
Does surrounding yourself with success make you less successful, like Obama?
Fox has the answer, tune in at 6.
Good news for the Mets: They didn’t actually lose money off of the Madoff Ponzi scheme. They actually made money off of it–$48 million!
Bad news for the Mets: They can now be sued by parties trying to recover money they lost, and so I presume their liability could be as much as $48 million. Unless, as the author suggests, they blow $452 million on the lawyers defending their right to keep the $48 million. It’s called the Carlos Delgado Postulate, wherein one wildly overpays for something that made initial sense but eventually became a galactic money pit.
Eric Chavez?
You know, you want these people to be role models, you put them up there and you say to your kids, “I want you to be just like this guy,” and then they let you down. I just don’t know what to believe in anymore.
Silly mjdittmer, the press has never said that the press is a role model. The press has only said that athletes are role models.
I, for one, am furious with sfgate for violating Mr. Phillips’ right to privacy.
Nantz and Phillips?! Ay carumba.
They surrounded themselves with a little too much success.
Golden spurtle? Myrtle spurtle?
Myrtle Turtle.
I think we fans of #32 should refer to ourselves as Custards.
agrd.
“Spotted Dick Porridge with Custard” reads like a suggestive headline from an account of a salacious party in The National Inquirer, Clue edition. Sidebar item: “Miss Scarlet in the Conservatory with the Candlestick.”
Ok, so balloon juice is growing on me.
I understand spin.
I understand manipulation.
I’ve learned to live with a degree of patently dishonest opinions.
But my god. Self-contradiction in mid-sentence is a whole other level (in the comments):
Wow, those computers are good. I’m most impressed with the made up quote from Vlad.
Also, I can’t wait for the butt-kissing “wow, this was so well-written!” comments at ** when they promote a robot to do the game recaps.
And then, in the sequel, the next version of the robot makes those comments. And still another version of the robot disagrees with that first set of comments. Nuclear holocaust comes shortly after the fifth wave of robots.
That might be the cleverest of the webcomics. I especially liked the 9/11 old people one.
Whoa — ‘toon (and each of his avatars) is a robot?
Fucking discuss, losers.
Padma looked especially lovely in her little black dress on last night’s Top Chef.
I didn’t watch it yet, but I’ll report back tomorrow. Perhaps someone in wardrobe went all Chanel on her “Dress shabbily and they remember the dress. Dress impeccably and they remember the woman.”